The Future of Commercial Real EstatePosted by RealMarket RealEstateMarket on May 18th, 2021 
Although serious supply-demand imbalances have continued to plague real estate markets into the 2000s in lots of areas, the mobility of capital in current sophisticated financial markets is encouraging to real estate developers. The loss of tax-shelter markets drained a substantial amount of capital from property and, in the short run, had a devastating effect on segments of the industry. However, most experts agree that lots of of those driven from property development and the true estate finance business were unprepared and ill-suited as investors. Over time, a return to property development that's grounded in the basics of economics, real demand, and real profits will benefit the industry.
Syndicated ownership of real estate was introduced in the first 2000s. Because many early investors were hurt by collapsed markets or by tax-law changes, the concept of syndication is currently being applied to more economically sound cash flow-return real estate. This return to sound economic practices will help ensure the continued growth of syndication. Real estate investment trusts (REITs), which suffered heavily in the real estate recession of the mid-1980s, have recently reappeared as an efficient vehicle for public ownership of real estate. REITs can own and operate property efficiently and raise equity for its purchase. The shares are more easily traded than are shares of other syndication partnerships. Thus, the REIT will probably provide a good vehicle to fulfill the public?s desire to own real estate.
A final overview of the factors that led to the problems of the 2000s is vital to understanding the opportunities which will arise in the 2000s. Real estate cycles are fundamental forces in the market. The oversupply that exists in most product types tends to constrain development of services, nonetheless it creates opportunities for the commercial banker.
The decade of the 2000s witnessed a boom cycle in property. The natural flow of the true estate cycle wherein demand exceeded supply prevailed through the 1980s and early 2000s. In those days office vacancy rates generally in most major markets were below 5 percent. Confronted with real demand for work place and other types of income property, the development community simultaneously experienced an explosion of available capital. Through the early years of the Reagan administration, deregulation of finance institutions increased the supply availability of funds, and thrifts added their funds to an already growing cadre of lenders. At the same time, the Economic Recovery and Tax Act of 1981 (ERTA) gave investors increased tax ?write-off? through accelerated depreciation, reduced capital gains taxes to 20 percent, and allowed other income to be sheltered with real estate ?losses.? In short, more equity and debt funding was designed for real estate investment than previously.
Even after tax reform eliminated many tax incentives in 1986 and the subsequent lack of some equity funds for real estate, two factors maintained property development. The trend in the 2000s was toward the development of the significant, or ?trophy,? property projects. Office buildings more than one million square feet and hotels costing hundreds of millions of dollars became popular. Conceived and begun before the passage of tax reform, these huge projects were completed in the late 1990s. The second factor was the continued option of funding for construction and development. Despite having the debacle in Texas, lenders in New England continued to invest in new projects. Following the collapse in New England and the continued unpredictable manner in Texas, lenders in the mid-Atlantic region continued to lend for new construction. After regulation allowed out-of-state banking consolidations, the mergers and acquisitions of commercial banks created pressure in targeted regions. These growth surges contributed to the continuation of large-scale commercial mortgage lenders [http://www.cemlending.com] going beyond enough time when an examination of the true estate cycle could have suggested a slowdown. The capital explosion of the 2000s for real estate is really a capital implosion for the 2000s. The thrift industry no longer has funds available for commercial real estate. The major life insurance company lenders are fighting mounting real estate. In related losses, some commercial banks try to reduce their real estate exposure after two years of building loss reserves and taking write-downs and charge-offs. Which means excessive allocation of debt obtainable in the 2000s is unlikely to create oversupply in the 2000s.
No new tax legislation that may affect real estate investment is predicted, and, generally, foreign investors have their very own problems or opportunities outside of the USA. Therefore excessive equity capital is not expected to fuel recovery real estate excessively.
Looking back at the real estate cycle wave, it seems safe to claim that the supply of new development will not occur in the 2000s unless warranted by real demand. Already in a few markets the demand for apartments has exceeded supply and new construction has begun at a reasonable pace.
Opportunities for existing real estate that is written to current value de-capitalized to produce current acceptable return will reap the benefits of increased demand and restricted new supply. New development that is warranted by measurable, existing product demand could be financed with an acceptable equity contribution by the borrower. Having less ruinous competition from lenders too wanting to make real estate loans allows reasonable loan structuring.
Hoboken real estate agents Financing the purchase of de-capitalized existing real estate for new owners is definitely an excellent source of real estate loans for commercial banks.
As property is stabilized by a balance of demand and supply, the speed and strength of the recovery will be determined by economic factors and their effect on demand in the 2000s. Banks with the capacity and willingness to take on new real estate loans should experience a number of the safest and most productive lending done within the last quarter century. Remembering the lessons of days gone by and returning to the basics of good real estate and good real estate lending is definitely the key to real estate banking in the future.
Like it? Share it! |